Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Examine This Report on case law on section 395 ppc convictions

Blog Article

77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

In accordance with the EPA rate schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and not be meant for redistribution around the internet or for commercial purposes. 

limitation of liability to the extent of a cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Regulation)

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

record on the department there isn't any record readily available whatsoever regarding promotion from the petitioner(Promotion)

Reasonable grounds are available over the record to connect the petitioner with the commission in the alleged offence. Although punishment with the alleged offence does not fall during the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. yet learned Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is from the credit on the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls during the exception where bail cannot be granted even while in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steerage continues to be sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:

 Petitioner having been declared an absconder in this case for over a person and a half year generates the apprehension that the petitioner may perhaps avoid standing trial and as a result delay the prosecution of the case. The material on record makes the case from the petitioner falls under two exceptions on the rule of grant of bail as mentioned previously mentioned.

The Court regarded the case to become maintainable under Article famous family law cases 184 (three) For the reason that danger and encroachment alleged were for example to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is proven and the employee is found guilty after because of process of regulation, it is the prerogative on the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, outside of the assorted penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed just isn't proportionate with the seriousness with the act of misconduct isn't enough however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion in a very structured and lawful manner. Read more

2. I have heard the realized counsel to the parties and acquired DPG at duration, perused the record and noticed that:-

Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is critical for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising and marketing transparency.

She did note that the boy still needed in depth therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was receiving counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved in the actions.

Because of this, basically citing the case is more very likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling someone to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in such-and-this kind of neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving throughout the community wanting to find their phone is probably going to generally be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and probable hazard to local residents. In the end, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, whilst observing the general development supports that electromagnetic fields have adverse effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out inside the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Advancement, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby the lack of full scientific certainty should not be used being a reason to prevent environmental degradation.